Arise, Sir Ian!
Welcome to Loose Pass - our weekly assortment of musings, mutterings, tickled fancies and disjointed thoughts. This week we will be mostly concerning ourselves with justice, Geech and big Al Charron...
As the Springboks were so keen to point out, justice was done at Ellis Park. The Lions romped to a splendid 28-9 victory that will carry the famous touring side to Australia on a high wave of refound pride and heady optimism.
We said it last week, and we'll say it again: South Africa deserved to win the series for the steely togetherness that they displayed in the first hour of the first Test and in the final twenty minutes of the second.
But the Lions of 2009 deserved something for their efforts. They were far too good a side to go down to the dreaded whitewash and they did their long and distinguished heritage proud by having the final word.
And this wasn't a case of fighting the dying of the light. This was strapping an incendiary device to the moon. They took the record-equalling victory together with an aggregate 74-63 scoreline that including seven tries to five.
Yes, the Boks might have mustered a little more heart and a few more top names had the series been on the line in the third Test. But let us not forget that the Lions had as many - if not more - absentees as the locals.
Where did the fire spring from? In truth, it was there all the time. It just needed the mastery of the Lion King himself - arise, Sir Ian! - to stoke up the dying embers left at the centre of the abandoned camp of 2005.
Whilst the real Knighted One took the Square Mile approach to management in New Zealand, and Graham Henry donned his old mortarboard in 2001, McGeechan and his cohorts were determined for old values to surface and they oversaw a tour of inclusion rather than exclusion.
The players bought into it to a man. They trained hard and they played hard, but there was also time for the often-neglected social side of touring and to sup beers with friends and fans alike.
To mould a team capable of challenging the reigning world champions over a three-Test series in barely a month is - at best - mission improbable.
But the fact Paul O'Connell and company went so desperately close to achieving it shows what a special bond was created.
It was the shortest of all Lions tours - just ten games - which challenged players, coaches and support staff to hit the ground running, and then keep going when the going got tough.
More importantly, the tour confirmed the emergence of a next generation of Lions - players will undoubtedly be back for more in Australia four years from now.
Jamie Roberts, Rob Kearney, Ugo Monye, James Hook, Mike Phillips, Adam Jones, Tom Croft and Jamie Heaslip all moved to new levels of excellence, illustrating what healthy prospects the Lions should have when they reconvene down under in 2013.
The events in New Zealand four years ago had some wondered whether the Lions had been damaged beyond repair.
But those doubts were not shared by true rugby men.
The Lions choose to tour not because it is easy, but because it is hard. And they go about their work in the knowledge that nothing is impossible if you have mates at your shoulder and faith in your heart.
The Lions are back, and world rugby owes an eternal debt to the class of 2009 - and to Ian McGeechan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Boks' decision to protest the ban meted out to Bakkies Botha has polarised opinion across the rugby world. Was it a petulant act that has diluted the power of legitimate protest, or a much-needed bulwark against the creeping emasculation of rugby?
It was neither. Far from being naive or gutsy, it was simply a smokescreen to divert attention from the real issue of the second Test: Schalk Burger's eye-gouge on Luke Fitzgerald and Peter de Villiers's subsequent comments on the incident.
All credit to them - as a diversion it worked quite brilliantly. The Lions were keen not to draw attention to Botha's charge on Adam Jones for the exact reason that it would take the spotlight of what is rapidly becoming rugby's major scourge: fingers raking at eyes.
But the Boks' protest managed to do just that. Now all we can talk about is a measly two-week ban that saw a player miss a dead-rubber match that he would have probably sat out anyway.
Okay, Boks - you win. If you want to talk about it, let's talk about it.
First, let's watch it again.
Call us cynical, but we are not too sure that Botha was thinking of anything over or beyond that initial hit. A leg-pumping drive to clear the player off the ball (normal protocol when joining a ruck) is conspicuous by its absence.
In fact, Botha didn't even get to grips with Jones and he actually went off his feet. Had the Welshman not been injured he could have followed up by wrenching the prone lock free of the ruck and out of the game. Or he could have held Botha down over the ball and won the Lions a penalty.
Our speculation aside, let's take a look at the laws of the game, and we draw your attention specifically to three of the four clauses under 'Law 6.2 - Joining a Ruck'.
16.2(a) All players forming, joining or taking part in a ruck must have their heads and shoulders no lower than their hips.
Penalty: Free Kick
16.2(b) A player joining a ruck must bind onto the ruck with at least one arm around the body of a team-mate, using the whole arm.
Penalty: Penalty Kick
16.2(d) All players forming, joining or taking part in a ruck must be on their feet.
Penalty: Penalty Kick
Is it not possible that Botha transgressed at least one of these laws? Did he not look like Michael Phelps on the starting blocks?
As it was, the lock wasn't penalised and the Lions lost their second prop of the match. It was a situation that left them chasing a game they eventually lost.
Jones, for his part, will spend the next six months with an armband of his own: a sling that will hold his shoulder in place.
And the Boks talk of justice?
Being world champions entails more than flaunting a gold pot. World champions are obliged to lend a dignified, paradigmatic leadership to their chosen sport.
England failed on that score. Alas, the Boks have followed suit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Well, perhaps we should lighten the mood!
Here, in no particular order, are our favourite quotes from the last week of the Lions tour.
"There's not a lot of top-notch games that can provide what a Lions series can provide. If anything is kept, I think the Lions series should be kept."
- John Smit underlines his reputation as one of world rugby's good guys
"We have a new template for preparing for a Test match - it includes quite a lot of alcohol."
- Ian McGeechan on the secret of his success
"'Any questions? I'm all ears."
- Lions scrummaging coach Graeme Rowntree breaks the ice with reporters
"When your mum, your wife and your sister text you to say they still love you, you know things haven't gone too well."
- Phil Vickery reflects on his 'beasting' in the first Test
"I wanted to break down and cry, it was an amazing feeling."
- Ugo Monye, smitten by the Lions bug, describes scoring in the third Test
"The small things like judicial hearing will not take away the fact that we won. Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk won the Nobel Peace Prize. No matter what they did wrong in their lives, no one can take away the fact that they won it."
- Peter de Villiers on (is?) Nelson Mandela
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And so England manager Martin Johnson has picked his Elite Player Squad (EPS) for the forthcoming season.
No. No need to glance at your calendar - it really is mid-July.
With no real form to go on, this pick is made on the basis of pure reputation, and picking on reputation runs contrary to all credible sporting norms.
Wasps coach Shaun Edwards publicly queried whether the early announcement of last year's EPS contributed to his club's woeful start to the season. What motivation is there for a player to improve or push himself, he asked, when he is assured of shot at the Test stage before the season has actually begun?
It's a good question - one that is set to return to haunt England and her clubs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hats off to Peter MacKay, the Canadian MP who recently laced his boot for a charity rugby match on the lawns of Parliament Hill, Ottawa.
The defence minister would have considered mobilising a commando unit or three when he found himself alone and marooned between his own sticks and a rampaging Al Charron.
Sadly for him, he didn't have the chance.
The former Canada captain was actually brought down in the tackle, but not before breaking MacKay's arm.
Still, it was all for a good cause - the game raised a significant amount of money for Canada's Military Families Fund.
So let's hope the idea catches on. Loose Pass would pay handsomely to see the Lions take out their frustrations on Gordon Brown's cabinet in the shadow of Big Ben.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there's one thing the public enjoys more than the sight of a sporting personality performing at the highest level, it's the sight of a sporting personality skating on thin ice.
If nothing else, the Lions tour has introduced Britain and Ireland to a new character who has duly been invited to perform pirouettes with the countless soccer managers who are tipped to go under in the next few months.
Loose Pass recently stumbled into a well-known British bookmaker (we were looking for the library, honest) and found the following odds pinned to the wall:
Peter De Villiers to be head coach of the South African team when they play 1st match of the Tri-Nations: 1/7
Peter De Villiers NOT to be head coach of the South African team when they play 1st match of the Tri-Nations: 4/1
Peter De Villiers to be head coach of the South African team when they play their last match of the Tri-Nations: 2/9
Peter De Villiers NOT to be head coach of the South African team when they play their last match of Tri-Nations: 3/1
Peter De Villiers to be head coach of the South African team when they play their match against France in November: 1/3
Peter De Villiers NOT to be head coach of the South African team when they play their match against France in November: 9/4
If Loose Pass was of a gambling persuasion (and we're not, we were simply looking for the library) we'd have a hefty punt on that 1/3 option.
South African rugby is held together by so much red tape that De Villiers's critics would need a squad of samurai soldier, working double shifts, to cut him loose.
Compiled by Andy Jackson







Comments
caltaff says...
Rather than poke out your eyes with a needle just invite Schalk around for a game of touch. A good gouge should be just as effective!
Posted 15:48 13th July 2009
Springbok says...
This website is an absolute joke. You lost! 2-1, end of story. I'd rather poke my eyes out with needles than read another article written by a bunch of British whingers clinging on to a laundry list of "what ifs". It's unbelievable that a website could have such biased writing. Make your homepage a British flag just so that everyone who comes here knows what they're dealing with.
Posted 09:29 13th July 2009
badtimesbailey says...
Thanks for posting the link to the Bakkies ruck clearing. I missed seeing the game so only had newspaper reports and what I was told to go by.
Having now seen the incident I can see that there was absolutely nothing in it!! What a joke that Botha was cited for this!!
I feel bad for Jones being injured but it was a freak accident.
Posted 09:47 12th July 2009
rich says...
What a delusional bunch these Brits are! First test the Lions were dead and buried until the Boks' idiot coach decided to throw on a bunch of subs who should never have been there and play them out of position, second test the Lions were gifted a 10 point head start thanks to Burger, Boks then missed 11 points in easy kicks and the Lions still couldn't win, and South Africans are hardly going to care about the result of the dead rubber if the Boks own coaching team didn't care about the result, using it mearly as game practise for fringe players ahead of the tri-nations.
But go on, kid yourselves that you should have won and you had a great team. Better luck in 2021.
Posted 16:51 11th July 2009
ORBok says...
Botha a 'smokescreen'? Oh, my lord...do you REALLY believe in this conspiracy? The problem with conspiracy theories is that they give way too much credit to those supposedly managing the conspiracy. You'll normally find those accused of conspiracy couldn't get blotto in a brewery! C'mon!
The whole Botha citing is a rugby sham. If you guys are honest...hmmm?...you'll have to admit that many would be cited in EVERY single game played, if this is the new standard. Just watch any game.
Posted 16:12 11th July 2009
caltaff says...
What a lot of rot!
The laws are still the laws even if not routinely enforced (for what ever reason).
Botha lined up Jones, was unbound, smashed in to his shoulder dislocating it, put him out for 6 months, he needs surgery and may never be the same again.
This charging in to often defenseless forwards at rucks to 'clear them out' is becoming a joke and it was only a matter of time before some one was seriously injured.
It is hard to give Botha the 'benefit of the doubt' with his history of being a hard man (or less charitably a thug).
The Lions are no angels but to defend this incident and accuse us whining is pathetic. With players as big and strong as they have become this was inevitable and the rules that are in place should be enforced.
This was a pivotal moment in the match, the scrums were being dominated by the Lions and the SA forwards having a tough time. The Boks benefited more from uncontested scrums and in a game decided by a kick in overtime it does not take much to change the result.
Forget the gouge this incident turned the test and the series, seriously injured a player who was crushing his opposite number and may end his career.
Posted 18:42 10th July 2009
rich says...
You'd think the Poms would be better losers, considering all the practise they've had. Whinge whinge whinge...... I'll be supporting the Ozzies in 2013, and won't bother tuning in to this website for rugby news
Posted 13:45 10th July 2009
countryboy says...
Why wasn't the British Lions No.2 banned for two weeks as well? He took Botha out exactly in the same manner as Botha took the Lions player.
Watch the video - he comes in unbound (not even from the back of the ruck) and takes Botha out. Seriously, this is a scandal, he should be banned for life...blah..blah...blah.
Posted 09:36 10th July 2009
Agreetodisagree says...
I love the British. They can make Dunkirk feel like a victory.
Posted 08:25 10th July 2009
Wallaroo says...
Agree good to see the Lions win the final game but to think there is some moral victory in pointing out an aggregate advantage just simply demonstrates childishness and bad sportsmanship.
The white arm bands - it's a conspiracy / deflection point is it. What a load of bull. Fair dinkum mate you must be a few beers short of a slab. The incident was ¿reckless¿ no doubt but worse than Heaslip most definitely not. I actually agree with the Boks, they have been the target of too much bias over the years. IMHO they have cleaned up dramatically and so credit should be given where its due. Undoubtedly they play hard but so do the Kiwi¿s, so a Kiwi citing a Bok for what their precious AB¿s do consistently is not only an injustice it¿s downright self-righteous. I know one thing if the Wallaby¿s had decided to fight for what they believed to be fair, irrespective of the method, all Australian fans would back them to the hilt. Have you considered that if you were in their position you may have just been at the point were enough is enough, and that taking a stand is a part of paradigmatic leadership and being treated fairly will then present them with more opportunity to grow the game.
Burger as most would agree was stupid and his actions dirty - no one is supporting his actions. Surely by now you know that and the difference between public defence and private rebuke; it happens in families, business, social networks, sport, etc.
BTW have a look at the games again, you¿ll find that the red worn by the Lions is no different to the colour your face will be when you see how many atrocities they committed.
We are waiting for you in 2013, we have equally if not more talent coming through so don¿t count your chickens just yet.
In conclusion the article is aptly named. A loose pass is exactly what it is.
Posted 05:04 10th July 2009
rugbyphile says...
Agree --the question wasn't whether Botha may have broken some law (which is almost never enforced) but whether he should have been cited and banned--you talk of smokescreens!! The citing and ban were clearly discriminatory---watch the series -or any international--and count the times players join a ruck without binding onto a teammate-you can't in fact bind onto a teammate if the nearest person is an opponent.Unparalleled display of ungracious pathetic partisan innaccurate whingeing by the British media the whole series--and still you go on--
Posted 02:57 10th July 2009
PM10 says...
A distraction, you say? Seems plausible enough - why else would they go to such lengths for such a trivial matter. As always, a splendid read! Many thanks!
Posted 20:58 09th July 2009
rugbyrox says...
Funny how you seem to think that the protest was a smokescreen to deter attention away from the Burger incident, when it seems pretty obvious that you have used the very same incident to smokescreen the fact that the Lions lost the match to the better team on the day.
The media have done a great job of reinforcing what everyone else in the world knows, that "poms" are in fact "whingers".
On the plus side though, this must be one of the only times in a very long time that the media hasn't totally slagged off their team because they lost, and actually shown a bit of back bone and stuck with them through the whole tour, win or lose.
Posted 17:59 09th July 2009
Agreetodisagree says...
The Bok protest had little to do with Bakkies Botha or Buger's sickening eye gouge. It sends a clear message to the IRB that there has been an obvious and clear double standards applied to the Boks in refereeing and the citing commison since well before the World Cup. The protest was well timed. The Boks are the World Champions, Super 14 champions, Rugby 7's Champions and Champions of the Lions. Had they lost their protest would be seen as sour grapes and ctitics would bring the winge word into play. Of cousre the Boks are no angels and have been guilty of offences. I am waiting with bated breath to see how the IRB will address this co-ordinated protest from the top management down. They must have all discussed the arm bands deep into the night, weighing up the consequnces and the validity of such a historic protest. I wouldn't get too excited about beating a weakened side with an obvious distraction, with little to play for anyway.
Posted 17:40 09th July 2009
TheBokke says...
LOL what an absolute pill of one eyed drivel. Dry your eyes you lost. I have always been an avid reader of this site due to its creditable articles. This is nothing other than an attempt to attack the Boks and down play their series win. Don't worry bud you can carry on your crying in 2021.
Posted 15:39 09th July 2009